This market resolves YES if a direct physical confrontation occurs between ICE/federal immigration agents and Minnesota state or local police officers (including Minneapolis Police Department, Minnesota State Patrol, or other state/local law enforcement) during an immigration enforcement operation. A confrontation requires active physical contact or use of force between the two groups—not merely verbal disputes, separate operations in the same area, or police responding to protests.
Resolution sources: Official statements from Minneapolis Police Department, Minnesota State Patrol, Minnesota Attorney General's office, or verified news reports from major outlets (CNN, NPR, AP, NBC News, Washington Post).
Update 2026-01-27 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): CBP (Customs and Border Protection) is included as a federal immigration agency for this market.
National Guard: If federalized and acting in immigration enforcement capacity, the creator prefers not to expand the definition to include conflicts between federalized National Guard and local police.
1,000ICE/federal immigration agents
Presumably includes CBP? What other agencies are included? Is it about agency, or what they're currently doing? Would a conflict between the National Guard and local police be included?
@EvanDaniel includes CBP. I was thinking about including the national guard if they’re federalized, but that seems like a mess, so I’d rather not expand the definition further.