People are divided over whether the footage shows him actually being impacted by her car, or only nearly impacted.
Resolves YES on confirmation from a reliable source that he was injured, NO on confirmation from a reliable source that he was not. Since "reliable source" may be subjective, I will not bet on this market.
Update 2026-01-10 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Definition of "injured": A scrape or bruise from vehicle impact would be sufficient for YES resolution. However, the market will resolve NO if very clear reliable sources confirm he was not injured, even if there's speculation about unreported minor injuries.
1,000People are also trading
@czrobertson definitely no way this admin would tell 2 anonymous lackeys to lie confidentially to a newspaper XD
Though he could have been minorly but visibly bruised and they exaggerate that into abdominal internal bleeding. And that might resolve the market yes according to Market OP.
@LondonL Clear confirmation that he received a scrape or bruise from impact of the vehicle would suffice for a YES resolution. But I'm not going to hold up NO resolution if we have very clear reliable sources saying he was not injured and people are speculating that he might have still gotten a minor scrape and not bothered to report it, or something like that.