MANIFOLD

What will be the reason cited the next time the doomsday clock moves closer to midnight?

Ṁ1kṀ3.4k

resolved Dec 4

100%50%

Nuclear Weapons

13%

27%

Climate

Other else

Other Technologic

1.6%

Other Natural (Astaroid, Natural Disasters etc)

1.7%Other

The original I created here: https://manifold.markets/DavidShawe0kg/what-will-be-the-reason-cited-the-n

did not have the answers linked. This has fixed it.

Market context

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Trader	Total profit
1		Ṁ286
2		Ṁ200
3		Ṁ178
4		Ṁ151
5		Ṁ114

People are also trading

In the next 5 years, will the Doomsday Clock reach 4 or more minutes to midnight?

10% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 10 minutes or more to midnight before 2040?

32% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 50 seconds to midnight by 2027?

13% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 5 minutes or more to midnight before 2040?

36% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 20 minutes or more to midnight before 2050?

24% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 30 seconds to midnight by 2029?

42% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 20 seconds to midnight by 2030?

51% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 15 minutes or more to midnight before 2050?

33% chance

Will the Doomsday Clock reach 40 seconds to midnight by 2028?

24% chance

In the next five years, will the people who make the Doomsday Clock declare Doomsday?

Sort by:

Resolved 100% Nuclear, since it seemed like the headlining concern and the independent multiple-choice version allowed us to resolve everything that got mentioned.

@DavidShawe0kg Can this resolve?

@DavidShawe0kg this can be resolved right?

https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2025-statement/

IMO it'd be OK to resolve:

Just 'nuclear weapons' yes as it is listed first
Nuclear, climate change, other, AI (other being biological) with equal or descending weight (actually maybe AI > biological as it is cited twice, once as exacerbating biological and once more by itself)