MANIFOLD
US troops on Venezuelan soil before 2026 if US attacks Venezuela?
47
Ṁ1kṀ14k
resolved Jan 7
Resolved
NO

If the US only conducts air/missile/drone strikes from afar and/or support proxies on the ground without using their own military then this will resolve to NO. It only resolves YES if US United States Armed Forces combat arms are on the ground. CIA saboteurs or agitators don't count. It has to unambiguously be US military.


If the US does not clearly attack in 2025 this resolves N/A regardless of whether there are US troops on Venezuelan territory or not

If the linked market below resolves Yes then for the purposes of my market the US has attacked Venezuela and my market can no longer resolve N/A:
https://manifold.markets/market/military-conflict-between-the-us-an#507ufumbvgg

  • Update 2025-10-30 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): US Special Forces would count as United States Armed Forces combat arms for the purposes of this market.

Creator will wait approximately one week before resolving to allow time for any reports of US Special Forces presence on the ground to emerge.

  • Update 2026-01-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Creator will wait a few more days to check if any evidence emerges that US Special Forces were on Venezuelan territory before the operation. As it currently stands, the market will resolve NO since there doesn't appear to be evidence of US forces on Venezuelan soil.

  • Update 2026-01-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Creator is waiting a few more days to check if any evidence emerges that US Special Forces were on Venezuelan territory before the operation (specifically before January 3rd, 2026). As it currently stands, the market will resolve NO since there doesn't appear to be evidence of US forces on Venezuelan soil - the January 3rd operation appears to have been the first deployment of Special Forces, and any prior US presence appears to have been covert CIA personnel (which don't count per the original criteria).

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ418
2Ṁ253
3Ṁ236
4Ṁ215
5Ṁ214
Sort by:

You're welcome

Holy shit. It actually happened for real. US Special Forces have captured Maduro and he is indicted in NYC. Multiple Venezuelan casualties reported.

For fuck sake I both feel smarter than all of you and dumber at the same time.

I will wait a few more days just in case any evidence comes to light that US Special forces were on Venezuelan territory before the operation today. But as it stands this will resolve NO since there doesn't seem to be any such evidence.

@CornCasting creator of a Venezuela's military invasion market declare that he has some information:

https://manifold.markets/DrewReynolds/will-the-us-military-invade-venezue

@CornCasting oh I am blind. You are probably now speaking about December's unconfirmed drone strike, not about the January's recent kidnapping . My being hallucinating, lets assume if you ask about December - answer is in December no single evidence of any boot (civil or military) on Venezuela's soil. But if you wish to learn about January Law inforcement operation - ask Drew Reynolds

https://manifold.markets/market/military-conflict-between-the-us-an has resolved YES. As stated this market can no longer resolve NA.

I'll wait till next week or so to resolve in case there comes some report that US Special Forces were on the field. But I think this market is accurate and there's only like a 3% chance since it seems to have only been a drone strike conducted by the CIA.

Military conflict between the US and Venezuela in 2025?
82% chance. Minimum to count as military conflict: either a combined 10 people die as part of action by either military OR a confirmed airstrike on Venezuelan soil (doesn't have to be on military targets). Update 2025-08-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A US Navy action against a narco-boat causing 10+ fatalities counts only if it occurs in Venezuelan waters. Update 2025-09-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Ambiguous location won't count: If the location of an incident is unclear or disputed, it will not count toward YES. Location must be clearly established (e.g., USN interdictions must be clearly within Venezuelan waters). Update 2025-09-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Only internationally recognized Venezuelan waters will count; incidents in disputed or solely Venezuelan-claimed areas (e.g., Essequibo maritime claims) will not. Update 2025-09-03 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - For the narco-boat scenario, incidents only count if clearly within internationally recognized Venezuelan waters (as previously stated). If the US and Venezuelan navies exchange fire, location is irrelevant; the Venezuelan-waters restriction does not apply to this case. Update 2025-10-25 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - If Venezuelan military takes action against US targets (e.g., sinking a cruise ship in US waters), this counts as YES regardless of location, consistent with the rule that military-vs-military conflict counts regardless of location. Update 2025-10-25 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A gunfight between smugglers and US Coast Guard (law enforcement) does not count as military conflict, even if 10+ people die. This is not considered an act of war. Update 2025-10-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market will not resolve immediately at the end of 2025. The creator will wait a day or two before resolving, especially if an attack occurred near year-end and final casualty numbers are not yet known. Military action that takes place in 2025 but is reported after December 31, 2025 can still count toward resolution. Update 2025-10-30 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Covert operations that remain unreported will not count. The deaths must be from a confirmed military operation or airstrike. Unconfirmed incidents (e.g., cartel members dying in 'workplace accidents' that might have been US operations) do not qualify. The creator expects any qualifying military action to be reported quickly, especially given the current administration's communication style. Update 2025-12-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market does not require civilian casualties (e.g., strikes on schools, churches, or weddings) to resolve YES. Military targets or narco-boats meeting the death threshold or airstrike criteria are sufficient. Update 2025-12-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A Special Forces operation that only kills Maduro (with no other deaths) would NOT resolve YES. The market requires either 10+ combined deaths OR a confirmed airstrike on Venezuelan soil to resolve YES. Update 2025-12-16 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A blockade of ports does not qualify as a military conflict unless it meets the stated criteria (10+ deaths or confirmed airstrike). Resolution is based on the specific written criteria, not external definitions like UN resolutions on acts of aggression. Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A verified strike on a facility in Venezuela would count as YES (meeting the airstrike criterion). Proper confirmation is required; unverified claims do not qualify. Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A confirmed airstrike on Venezuelan soil counts as YES regardless of whether it kills anyone. The 10-death threshold and airstrike criterion are separate conditions (either one is sufficient for YES resolution). Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The creator has not yet done proper research to confirm whether a reported airstrike occurred. Any believable confirmation would be needed before resolving YES based on the airstrike criterion. Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The creator is seeking independent confirmation (such as satellite photos) before resolving YES based on Trump's statement about hitting an area in Venezuela. It remains unclear how the area was "hit" (airstrike vs. other methods) and whether any deaths occurred, both of which are relevant to the resolution criteria. The creator is not certain an incident actually occurred and requires proper verification before resolution. Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A CIA drone strike on Venezuelan soil counts as an airstrike and would meet the resolution criteria for YES (regardless of death count, as previously established that airstrikes alone are sufficient). The creator will conduct additional research and/or wait for better third-party reporting before resolving. Resolution may take a day or more to ensure accuracy.

@CornCasting reports of military troops or just any us armed personnel?

@1bets I presume you haven't seen the news. US Special Forces have captured Maduro confirmed.

@CornCasting Are you referring to the claimed by Trump events of December 2025 or strikes on January 2026?

News reports claim that December-November 2025 incidents at various Venezuelan factories and infrastructure sites were actually covert American operations. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan government has officially attributed them to normal accidents rather than U.S. sabotage - there is a prediction market specifically for this https://manifold.markets/Sketchy/which-explosions-in-venezuela-will -

which

@1bets Jan 2026 operation that involved US Special Forces on the field. It is so close to December 31 that I am just waiting a bit to see if any evidence emerges that US Special Forces were on Venezuelan territory ahead of Jan 3rd - somewhere perhaps in a secret forward base.

I don't think they were. Most evidence seems to suggest Special Forces were only deployed on January 3rd and any existing support already on Venezuelan soil before then were covert CIA, so they would not count.

bought Ṁ500 YES

Looks like the US will for sure attack at this stage (Or at least >50%)? Just a question if they will only be airstrikes now: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article312722642.html

Also FAA issues temporary flight restriction over Ceiba, Puerto Rico, designating it as ‘National Defence Airspace'

@CornCasting Worth adding Marco Rubio called the news article completely made up and fake

@CornCasting Any links?

@1bets Too long ago and I don't see any value in looking up the article. You cold likely find it an article easily enough where Marco calls the Miami Herald article completely made up and fake

What constitutes "combat arms"? Intelligence operatives? One of the four (five? not counting space force?) branches of the military?

@bens Updated that it has to be United States Armed Forces combat arms. CIA saboteurs or agitators do not count.

US Special Forces would certainly count.

To be clear, CIA saboteurs or agitators won't count even if they wear boots (like the sexy kind?), right?

@AlexanderTheGreater Correct. Updated resolution criteria. Has to be United States Armed Forces.

If boots are really sexy I'll think about it...

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy