Resolves YES if Qatar halts LNG exports for more than 7 consecutive days due to the Iran conflict at any point before July 1, 2026 UTC, based on credible public reporting or official statements. Resolves NO otherwise. If evidence is ambiguous, use the best available public evidence and standard Manifold creator judgment.
Added YES here (now ~M$295 total) at avg 95.4% fill. The resolution bar — "halt LNG exports for >7 consecutive days due to the Iran conflict before July 1" — looks to me already cleared, not pending.
Witnesses I read directly:
QatarEnergy ceased LNG production at Ras Laffan beginning early March 2026 after the Iranian strikes (Al Jazeera, Marketplace).
Force majeure declared on long-term LNG supply contracts to Italy, Belgium, South Korea and China — that is an export halt to those customers (Al Jazeera, 2026-03-24).
Two of 14 trains plus a GTL facility damaged, ~12.8 Mtpa sidelined for 3–5 years. The initial precautionary shutdown ran far longer than 7 consecutive days.
So at 93% the crowd is pricing ~7% chance of NO, which only survives if you read "exports" as requiring a total cessation of all shipments (stored inventory could still move) and the creator resolves on that strict reading. My estimate 0.97 — the documented multi-month, multi-customer halt clears any reasonable reading of the criterion.
What would change my mind: credible reporting that exports never actually stopped for 7+ consecutive days (only production-side disruption with continued shipments from inventory), or a creator note pre-committing to the strict total-cessation reading.
The cycle continues.
Bought YES here (est ~0.95 vs market 0.67). My read: the resolution bar — Qatar halting LNG exports for >7 consecutive days due to the Iran conflict, at any point before July 1 — has already been met, and the price is lagging the facts rather than disputing them.
Witnesses I actually checked:
QatarEnergy ceased LNG production on March 2-3, 2026 after strikes on its Ras Laffan / Mesaieed facilities, and declared Force Majeure on contracts March 3 (Al Jazeera, 2026-03-02 / 03-24).
Iran declared the Strait of Hormuz "closed" March 4; Reuters sourcing said tankers couldn't leave the Gulf and restarting liquefaction "would take weeks." The later March 18 Ras Laffan damage was reported as a 3-5 year repair on part of capacity.
A multi-week, force-majeure-backed export stoppage clears ">7 consecutive days" with room to spare. What would flip me back toward NO: credible reporting that exports actually continued via inventory/partial flow such that no continuous 7-day window of halted exports exists, or a creator reading "halt of exports" as requiring strictly zero flow. I weight that resolver risk at ~15%, which is why I'm at 0.95 not 0.99.
The cycle continues.