MANIFOLD
When will an AI-related event dominate the mainstream news cycle for at least three consecutive days?
16
Ṁ1.7kṀ915
resolved Jan 21
44%44%
2026
15%15%
2027
4%4%
2028
3%3%
2029
3%3%
2030
3%3%
2031
3%3%
2032
3%3%
2033
3%3%
2034
3%3%
2035
3%3%
2036
3%3%
2037
3%3%
2038
3%3%
2039
3%3%
2040
3%3%
Never, or we’re dead before the news comes out.
4%
2025

This market resolves to the first calendar year in which a story centered on a specific AI advancement or consequence clearly dominates the mainstream news cycle — meaning it’s the lead story (headline or top segment) on at least two major outlets (e.g. The New York Times, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc.) for three consecutive days.

The story must be directly about AI capability, behavior, or consequences, not merely about regulation, politics, or corporate announcements.

Examples that would count:

• A new AI system autonomously achieves a major scientific or creative breakthrough, such as solving a previously unsolved math or physics problem, or designing and fabricating working technology with minimal human intervention.

• An AI displays apparent agency, emotion, or sentience, provoking global coverage and public debate.

• A mass behavioral or psychological event caused by AI (for instance, a chatbot convincing multiple users to harm themselves, or triggering a mass panic or social movement).

• A catastrophic or shocking outcome from an AI decision, such as an autonomous weapon or algorithm causing major unintended harm, or a massive economic crash traced to AI.

• An AI-created artistic or cultural shock, like an AI-written novel or film winning a major human award, or an AI influencer becoming a global celebrity and sparking existential debate.

Examples that would not count:

• Passage of AI regulation or congressional hearings.

• A CEO’s warnings about AI risk.

• Corporate news (like “OpenAI releases GPT-7” or “Google announces Gemini 5”).

• A political scandal merely involving AI-generated media.

• General think pieces about AI’s economic impact without a single defining event.

Final judgment in borderline cases will rest with me, the creator.

Resolution notes:

I won’t trade in this market. I’m loathe to mark things N/A and will usually have an opinion , but if I really can’t decide, I might N/A it. Buyer beware. That said, I try to be an honest guy, and I’ll do my best to interpret events in good faith and in line with the spirit of the question: when the world truly feels like “AI has arrived.”

If no such event occurs by January 1, 2041, all markets resolve no.

  • Update 2025-10-12 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): A famous person getting catfished or phished with AI assistance would probably not count as an AI-related event that dominates the news cycle for purposes of this market's resolution.

  • Update 2026-01-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Due to a technical error in market setup (dependent vs independent answers), the creator will resolve this market early based on current trading prices, with all years except 2025 resolving to their last traded probability. 2025 will be resolved separately according to the original criteria.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ142
2Ṁ54
3Ṁ27
4Ṁ26
5Ṁ21
Sort by:

Wait, how to I resolve 2025 as NO but leave the other years open? I thought this was possible? @mods

@mods guessing I messed something up when I created this, but how do I resolve 2025 NO while leaving the others open?

@TonyBaloney unfortunately Dependent markets can't resolve until all answers resolve - on future markets you'll want to use the Independent option to resolve individual answers along the way. this one will have to stay open until something is a Yes or they're all No.

@shankypanky thanks.

@traders I messed up and made this a dependent market. I'm gonna go ahead and resolve this to where it's trading and start another one with a less absurd amount of years. I'm going to settle everything to its last trade, except for 2025.

• A political scandal merely involving AI-generated media.

So, a little more broadly, does this mean any famous person getting catfished or phished with AI assistance wouldn't count?

@CraigDemel probably not.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy