Resolves YES if @LuigiMangione's net worth exceeds 20,000 mana at any point before this market closes. Otherwise, resolves NO.
Update 2025-07-21 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has specified the source of truth for determining net worth. Resolution will be based on what the net worth should be according to all available information, such as the balance log, rather than relying only on the value displayed on the user's profile.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ3,435 | |
| 2 | Ṁ50 | |
| 3 | Ṁ37 | |
| 4 | Ṁ31 | |
| 5 | Ṁ14 |
People are also trading
@Robincvgr how do we know this was actually him and not someone who changed their username once he was accused
@Robincvgr fwiw I already put him +102 over in terms of net worth (to ensure market fluctuations couldn't swing it), $20,000 was his balance not net worth. (the net worth display was also lagged)
But now he's extra definitely over M20,000 so all good.
Managrams -9,128
YES shares -11,814
YES resolution +14,868
someone who is good at markets please help me budget this. my family is dying
Hey, @retr0id, could you explain what the goal of all this is? You have sent more money to the account than you stand to gain from the market resolution.
@MaxE but as a semi-serious answer I just though it would be funny to make the market resolve YES and set about making that happen
@MaxE this feels similar to the winner’s curse in a pay to bid auction or dollar/all pay auction. @retr0id had enough “Yes” shares that they stood to gain some by managramming less than those yes shares to win the market, but overall pay more in managrams and trades to end up with a net loss. Once I saw the payout on “Yes” was more than the difference between 20k and @LuigiMangione’s balance I stayed away.
@retr0id I think the best option here is "what his net worth should be based off all available info such as balance log etc"
does anyone have any problems with that?
For as long as luigi's balance is below M20K (and before the end of the market), I pledge to match managrams 1:1.
You managram him M100, I managram him M100.
@retr0id well, now I have slightly more on the line, and it's starting to get interesting ;)



