Will "Behavioral red-teaming is unlikely to produce..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2
Ṁ100Ṁ107Feb 1
7%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Behavioral red-teaming is unlikely to produce clear, strong evidence that models aren't scheming is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "The behavioral selection model for predicting..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "Why White-Box Redteaming Makes Me Feel Weird" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Red-Thing-Ism" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Among Us: A Sandbox for Agentic Deception" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "How training-gamers might function (and win)" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Training a Reward Hacker Despite Perfect Labels" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "Reducing LLM deception at scale with self-oth..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Erasmus: Social Engineering at Scale" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "METR's Observations of Reward Hacking in Rece..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance