
If he goes, it'll be
- "Suicide" 
- Disappearance 
- Murder with no obvious motive or uncaught perpetrator with no or weak motive 
- Hit and run, no leads 
- Alone, crashed car into tree on empty highway 
- Killed in custody 
- Etc, including other methods which could easily disguise an attack or silencing 
Non suspicious ways:
- Disease 
- Traffic accident with cars having a dashcam and footage, etc 
- Still alive at end of market 
This may be subjective but I'll try my best to judge fairly.
It seems like anyone on earth who believes that gain-of-function research is dangerous has an obvious motive to kill him. I'm not saying it's a valid reason, but it is a motive in the criminal sense. So I'm not sure how "Murder with no obvious motive or uncaught perpetrator with no or weak motive" could be true.
@asmith I agree in theory; that's why cases of murder where there is no known assailant will be treated as suspicious here. Even if it looks like a possibly relatively simple accident, because of the background information you listed.
In my phrasing "no obvious motive" means no local motive; and that case is under the "suspicious" header so I think it matches what your point is.