Will I be excited by these papers?
4
Ṁ3kṀ616resolved Jan 5
Resolved
N/APlace holder
Resolved
N/ADowker and Kent (1996) "On the Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics"
Resolved
YESAgmon and Spangler (2020) "A Multi-Scale Approach to Modeling E. coli Chemotaxis"
Resolved
YESBeer & Williams (2015) “Information processing and dynamics in minimally cognitive agents”
Resolved
NOBeer et al. (2024) "Deriving The Intrinsic Viability Constraint of an Emergent Individual from First Principles"
Resolved
YESTegmark (2000) “Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes”
Resolved
NOGarola & Sozzo (2007) "The physical interpretation of partial traces: Two nonstandard views”
Resolved
NOMaximilian Schlosshauer (2019) "Quantum Decoherence”
Resolved
NOJeknić-Dugić, Dugić & Francom (2014) “Quantum Structures of a Model-Universe: An Inconsistency with Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”
Resolved
NOKofler & Brukner (2006) “Classical world arising out of quantum physics under the restriction of coarse-grained measurements”
Resolved
NOInamori (2016) "No Quantum Process Can Explain the Existence of the Preferred Basis: Decoherence Is Not Universal”
Resolved
NOOkon & Sudarsky (2016) “Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere”
Resolved
NOFortin & Lombardi (2014) “Partial Traces in Decoherence and in Interpretation: What Do Reduced States Refer to?”
Resolved
NOCrull (2017) "Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics"
Resolved
NOCrull (2015) "Less Interpretation and More Decoherence in Quantum Gravity and Inflationary Cosmology"
Resolved
NOAdler (2003) “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson”
Resolved
NOSchlosshauer (2007) "Observations, the Quantum Brain, and Decoherence” (Chapter 9 from the book “Decoherence”)
Resolved
NODeutsch (1985) "Quantum theory as a universal physical theory”
Resolved
NOFoster & Brown (1988) “On a recent attempt to define the interpretation basis in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics”
Resolved
NOGalvan (2010) “On the preferred-basis problem and its possible solutions”
Which of the papers will I find sufficiently good/awful such that I'll create a study note of it on my website? (There you can find past examples of papers that I find sufficiently good/awful.)
I will not bet on this market.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ4 | |
| 2 | Ṁ3 |