
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2026? *
10
Ṁ170Ṁ3072027
95%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
If it's unambigious, resolves to that. If ambiguous, I'll ask people who are/were active on lesswrong which way they think it should resolve and resolve based on that.
This requires not just a few people posting every so often, or a lot of spam - it requires some sense of community and frequent high quality discussion, somewhat similar to what exists today.
I think the very vague criteria for this are fine, and anything more specific would probably just diverge from the spirit, but i'm curious if anyone has the other opinion.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will LessWrong still be meaningfully active in 2030? *
86% chance
Will Lesswrong get fewer visits in March 2026 than in March 2023?
22% chance
How much LessWrong karma will I have in January 2028?
3,353
Will "when will LLMs become human-level bloggers?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "LessWrong has been acquired by EA" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "2025 in AI predictions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "2024 in AI predictions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
5% chance
Will "Slowdown After 2028: Compute, RLVR Uncertaint..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "The Eldritch in the 21st century" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "The News is Never Neglected" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance