Will "SAE reconstruction errors are (empirically) p..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
4
Ṁ1kṀ523Feb 1
9%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post SAE reconstruction errors are (empirically) pathological is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "Tips and Code for Empirical Research Workflows" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Negative Results for SAEs On Downstream Tasks..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
39% chance
Will "Conceptual Rounding Errors" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
17% chance
Will "Von Neumann's Fallacy and You" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Attribution-based parameter decomposition" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "It's hard to make scheming evals look realist..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Erasmus: Social Engineering at Scale" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Lies, Damned Lies, and Proofs: Formal Methods..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Some articles in “International Security” tha..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Recontextualization Mitigates Specification G..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance