Will "Making every researcher seek grants is a brok..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
4
Ṁ140Ṁ68Feb 1
15%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Making every researcher seek grants is a broken model is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "Tips and Code for Empirical Research Workflows" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Go..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Abstract advice to researchers tackling the d..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Research directions Open Phil wants to fund i..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
5% chance
Will "The funding conversation we left unfinished" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Making deals with early schemers" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
23% chance
Will "Scientific breakthroughs of the year" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Publishing academic papers on transformative ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "So You Want To Make Marginal Progress..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
26% chance
Will "Tips On Empirical Research Slides" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance